1952 Holden FX vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (202 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 610 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FX | Sigma |
Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |