1952 Holden FX vs. 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 745 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1992 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | FX | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
