1952 Holden FX vs. 1993 Mazda AZ-1
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 136 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | AZ-1 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2240 mm |