1952 Holden FX vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lada Niva (79 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1995 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Holden | Lada |
| Model | FX | Niva |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2710 mm |
