1952 Holden FX vs. 1995 Renault Laguna

To start off, 1995 Renault Laguna is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Renault Laguna (115 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Renault Laguna weights approximately 345 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Renault Laguna (168 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: