1952 Holden FX vs. 1995 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1995 Suzuki Swift is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Suzuki Swift (66 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 140 kg more than 1995 Suzuki Swift.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1995 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | FX | Swift |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |