1952 Holden FX vs. 1999 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 1999 Westfield ZEI is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Westfield ZEI (129 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 250 kg more than 1999 Westfield ZEI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Westfield ZEI (162 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Westfield ZEI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1999 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Holden | Westfield |
| Model | FX | ZEI |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2340 mm |
