1952 Holden FX vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 220 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | AZ |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |