1952 Holden FX vs. 2004 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2004 Pontiac Montana is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Montana (185 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Pontiac Montana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Montana (298 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX. 2004 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: