1952 Holden FX vs. 2004 TVR T 350
To start off, 2004 TVR T 350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 TVR T 350 (346 HP) has 295 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 TVR T 350 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2004 TVR T 350 | |
Make | Holden | TVR |
Model | FX | T 350 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 346 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |