1952 Holden FX vs. 2005 Kia Sedona

To start off, 2005 Kia Sedona is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Sedona (195 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Sedona weights approximately 1208 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: