1952 Holden FX vs. 2005 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (175 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2005 Land Rover Freelander | |
| Make | Holden | Land Rover |
| Model | FX | Freelander |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2570 mm |
