1952 Holden FX vs. 2005 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2005 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Drifter (112 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Drifter weights approximately 85 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Drifter (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Drifter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2005 Mazda Drifter | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | Drifter |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1055 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3010 mm |
