1952 Holden FX vs. 2005 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2005 MCC ForTwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 240 kg more than 2005 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2005 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | FX | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1810 mm |