1952 Holden FX vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP) has 231 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (430 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3270 mm |