1952 Holden FX vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 160 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | MPV |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2850 mm |