1952 Holden FX vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FX | Clio |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
