1952 Holden FX vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura CSX weights approximately 343 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Holden | Acura |
Model | FX | CSX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |