1952 Holden FX vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 85 kg more than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |