1952 Holden FX vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | FX | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2685 mm |
