1952 Holden FX vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |