1952 Holden FX vs. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (207 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (254 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2009 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | FX | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |