1952 Holden FX vs. 2010 Ford E-250

To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 880 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX. 2010 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: