1952 Holden FX vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,953 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (257 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (281 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | FX | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 257 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
