1952 Holden FX vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 640 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW 640 has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW 640 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Holden | BMW |
Model | FX | 640 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4894 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1369 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2855 mm |