1952 Holden FX vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (148 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FX | Lancer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2634 mm |