1952 Holden FX vs. 2012 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 3008 (148 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 2012 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 3008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2012 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Holden | Peugeot |
| Model | FX | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2613 mm |
