1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 590 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Hudson Hornet | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Hudson | Toyota |
Model | Hornet | Master RR |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2540 mm |