1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Hudson | Reliant |
| Model | Hornet | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 798 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2290 mm |
