1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 540 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Hudson | Nissan |
| Model | Hornet | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2530 mm |
