1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 135 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1952 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1952 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Hudson | Jaguar |
| Model | Hornet | XJR |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2910 mm |
