1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 330 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Hornet | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2760 mm |
