1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 661 kg more than 1952 Hudson Hornet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Hudson | Land Rover |
| Model | Hornet | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 4390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 300 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2461 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2890 mm |
