1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 178 kg more than 1952 Hudson Hornet.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Hudson Hornet | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Hudson | Jeep |
Model | Hornet | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2660 mm |