1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 310 kg more than 1952 Hudson Hornet.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 1952 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1952 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Hudson Hornet | 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Hudson | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Hornet | ML |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2920 mm |