1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 748 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Hudson Hornet | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Hudson | Nissan |
Model | Hornet | Note |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1691 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2600 mm |