1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 325 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 2010 BMW 325 | |
| Make | Hudson | BMW |
| Model | Hornet | 325 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2770 mm |
