1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 157 kg more than 1952 Hudson Hornet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Hudson Hornet | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Hudson | Jeep |
| Model | Hornet | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 285 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1957 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2946 mm |
