1952 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1982 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1982 Toyota Starlet is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Humber Super Snipe (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Humber Super Snipe | 1982 Toyota Starlet | |
| Make | Humber | Toyota |
| Model | Super Snipe | Starlet |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4139 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
