1952 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1998 Tata E
To start off, 1998 Tata E is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1952 Humber Super Snipe. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1952 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 383 kg more than 1998 Tata E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Humber Super Snipe (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Humber Super Snipe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Humber Super Snipe | 1998 Tata E | |
Make | Humber | Tata |
Model | Super Snipe | E |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Size | 4139 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2810 mm |