1952 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Galant
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Humber Super Snipe | 1999 Mitsubishi Galant | |
| Make | Humber | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Super Snipe | Galant |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4139 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |
