1952 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Humber Super Snipe. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1952 Humber Super Snipe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Humber Super Snipe (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Humber Super Snipe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Humber Super Snipe | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Humber | Isuzu |
| Model | Super Snipe | KB |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4139 cc | 3494 cc |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 93.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
