1952 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1952 Humber Super Snipe. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1952 Humber Super Snipe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Humber Super Snipe. (286 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Humber Super Snipe.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Humber Super Snipe | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Humber | Holden |
Model | Super Snipe | UTE |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4139 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |