1952 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1986 Peugeot 205
To start off, 1986 Peugeot 205 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot 205. (85 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Because 1952 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Peugeot 205. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar C-Type | 1986 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
Model | C-Type | 205 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1580 mm |