1952 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (216 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 250 kg more than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1952 Jaguar C-Type has manual transmission. 1952 Jaguar C-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: