1952 Jaguar C-Type vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 607 kg more than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (320 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar C-Type | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | C-Type | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |