1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1959 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1959 Lincoln Continental is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 928 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1959 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
| Model | XK | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 7043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 349 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 94 mm |
| Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2223 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3330 mm |
