1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1962 Renault 8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 555 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XK | 8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2280 mm |
