1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | XK | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 38 L |
