1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 1967 Opel Record is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1967 Opel Record | |
| Make | Jaguar | Opel |
| Model | XK | Record |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |
